Daimlerchrysler$501699$ - traduction vers italien
Diclib.com
Dictionnaire ChatGPT
Entrez un mot ou une phrase dans n'importe quelle langue 👆
Langue:     

Traduction et analyse de mots par intelligence artificielle ChatGPT

Sur cette page, vous pouvez obtenir une analyse détaillée d'un mot ou d'une phrase, réalisée à l'aide de la meilleure technologie d'intelligence artificielle à ce jour:

  • comment le mot est utilisé
  • fréquence d'utilisation
  • il est utilisé plus souvent dans le discours oral ou écrit
  • options de traduction de mots
  • exemples d'utilisation (plusieurs phrases avec traduction)
  • étymologie

Daimlerchrysler$501699$ - traduction vers italien

SCO v. Daimler Chrysler; SCO v. DaimlerChrysler; SCO vs. DaimlerChrysler; SCO Group, Inc. vs. DaimlerChrysler Corp.

Daimlerchrysler      
n. nome di grande società tedesca produttrice di aerei civili
DaimlerChrysler Aerospace         
  • Tornado ECR]] of the [[German Air Force]] in 1999
  • BK 117]]
  • An [[ADAC]] [[Eurocopter EC135]], 2008
  • Head-on view of a [[Dornier 228]]
  • Rockwell-MBB X-31, one of two X-31 Enhanced Fighter Maneuverability Demonstrator aircraft (top)
1989-2000 AEROSPACE MANUFACTURER IN GERMANY
Deutsche Aerospace AG; Daimler-Chrysler Aerospace; DaimlerBenz Aerospace; Daimler Benz Aerospace; Deutsche Aerospace; DaimlerChrysler Aerospace AG; DaimlerChrysler Aerospace
nome di società tedesca costruttrice di aerei di linea civili (membro del gruppo consorziale europeo)

Wikipédia

SCO Group, Inc. v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.

SCO Group v. DaimlerChrysler was a lawsuit filed in the United States, in the state of Michigan. In December 2003, SCO sent a number of letters to Unix licensees. In these letters, SCO demanded that the licensees certify certain things regarding their usage of Linux. DaimlerChrysler, a former Unix user and current Linux user, did not respond to this letter. On March 3, 2004, SCO filed suit against DaimlerChrysler for violating their Unix license agreement, by failing to respond to the certification request made by SCO. The parties agreed to a stipulated dismissal order on December 21, 2004. The case was dismissed without prejudice, but if SCO wishes to pursue the timeliness claim again, it must pay DaimlerChrysler's legal fees since August 9. On December 29, 2004, SCO filed a claim of appeal notice. On January 31, 2005, the claim of appeal was dismissed.